Ratel News Logo
Court Wipes Out NDC's Legal Existence. Peter Obi Calls It "Bizarre." His Lawmakers Call It a "Judicial Coup." INEC Is Ready to Delist Them.
Politics

Court Wipes Out NDC's Legal Existence. Peter Obi Calls It "Bizarre." His Lawmakers Call It a "Judicial Coup." INEC Is Ready to Delist Them.

Ratel Admin
June 27, 2026
3 Views

On June 26, 2026, the Federal High Court in Lokoja set aside the December 2025 judgment that had forced INEC to register the NDC. The ruling reversed the party's legal existence because an earlier case was decided without hearing the Peace Movement Party, which claims NDC stole its logo. INEC is ready to delist them. Peter Obi called the ruling "bizarre." His lawmakers called it a "judicial coup against democracy." The NDC is heading to the Court of Appeal. Here is every detail.

Court Wipes Out NDC's Legal Existence. Peter Obi Calls It "Bizarre." His Lawmakers Call It a "Judicial Coup." INEC Is Ready to Delist Them.

On the evening of Friday, June 26, 2026, the Nigeria Democratic Congress ceased to be a legally registered political party in Nigeria.

Justice Isah Dashen of the Federal High Court in Lokoja, Kogi State, set aside the judgment of the court delivered on December 10, 2025, noting that all parties affected were not heard. He stated that the earlier judgment was constitutionally defective as it was delivered without hearing from all concerned parties, and that such an omission rendered the entire process null and void.

The immediate consequence: INEC is no longer required to recognise the NDC as a registered political party. The ruling means the NDC cannot sponsor or field candidates in any election unless it secures fresh registration.

Peter Obi is the NDC's presidential candidate. He is the man millions of Nigerians voted for in 2023. He now leads a party that, as of today, does not legally exist.

He called the ruling "bizarre."

His lawmakers called it something stronger.

What Happened in the Lokoja Courtroom

The ruling on Friday did not emerge from nowhere. It was the product of a legal challenge that had been building since the NDC's registration was first secured through a court order rather than through INEC's standard vetting process.

Unlike the other 13 associations INEC screened for registration ahead of 2027, the NDC was not among the associations pre-qualified for the 2025 party registration exercise. INEC Chairman Joash Amupitan acknowledged in February 2026 that while only the Democratic Leadership Alliance met all conditions for registration under the Constitution, Electoral Act, and INEC guidelines, the commission had registered the NDC anyway in compliance with the Lokoja court judgment.

In other words: the NDC did not earn its way onto INEC's register through the official process. It got there by a court order, in a case that was decided in just 32 days. Rival parties immediately noted the speed.

The legal challenge that brought everything down on Friday was filed by the Peace Movement Party. The court found that the earlier judgment had adversely affected the rights of the Peace Movement Party, which was not joined as a party in the suit despite claiming ownership of the logo the NDC relied upon to obtain its registration.

The court upheld the application filed by the PMP, ruling that the party was a necessary party to the suit. Justice Dashen further ruled that the status quo be restored to what it was before the December 2025 judgment, pending the determination of the substantive suit.

The earlier judgment that compelled INEC to register the NDC is now void. Every action that INEC had taken as a result of that judgment is therefore nullified. This includes the recognition of the NDC as a political party, the issuance of a certificate of registration, the addition of the NDC to INEC's official record, and the preparation to include the party on ballot papers in the 2027 elections.

Justice Dashen also found that material facts were suppressed in the earlier proceedings, specifically the PMP's claim that the NDC's registration was based on a logo PMP had previously submitted to INEC before the suit even began.

The logo dispute is the technical heart of the matter. If PMP can prove the NDC's registered logo was originally theirs, the NDC's registration was built on a foundation it did not have the right to use.

What This Does NOT Mean

Before the panic fully sets in, one critical distinction needs to be stated clearly.

The court did not rule against the NDC's eligibility to be registered as a political party. Rather, it held that the earlier judgment was procedurally flawed because all parties with a direct interest in the original dispute were not before the court. The substantive question of whether the NDC should be registered remains unresolved and will be determined during the fresh hearing.

It is important to note that the court did not rule that the NDC cannot be registered as a political party, but stated that the earlier judgment cannot stand because all necessary parties were not included. The issue concerning the registration of the NDC remains pending, and the suit will be heard afresh after the PMP and other affected parties are included.

The NDC is not permanently banned from existing. It has been sent back to the start of the process. The substantive case, with all parties now included, must be heard before any final determination is made.

Whether that determination can be made before the 2027 elections is the urgent question.

What INEC Said

INEC said on Friday it had applied for the Certified True Copy of the ruling and would act accordingly upon receipt. "We have applied for the Certified True Copy of the judgment. Until we receive it we cannot be in a position to comment on it. However, the position that existed before the December 20, 2025 judgment was that INEC rejected NDC's letter of intent to be registered as a party," INEC National Commissioner in charge of Information Mohammed Kudu Haruna told Saturday Vanguard.

The position INEC is restoring is the one from before December 2025. That position was: NDC's letter of intent was rejected. They are not registered.

What Peter Obi Said

The statement, issued by the Peter Obi Media Reach and signed by spokesperson Idris Zekeri Jnr., said: "We have received the news of today's bizarre ruling from the court in Lokoja regarding the legal status of the Nigeria Democratic Congress. While our legal teams are thoroughly reviewing the judgment to initiate immediate corrective and appellate measures, our Principal urges all our supporters, coalition partners, and patriots nationwide to remain absolutely calm and focused."

The media office emphasised that the legal decision would not change their ultimate goal of establishing an alternative political platform for Nigerians, and assured their network of supporters that they will fight for their legal rights intensely and that their momentum remains completely unchanged despite the courtroom detour.

The word "bizarre" has been widely noted. It signals Obi's position that the ruling is not a legitimate legal outcome but an attack dressed in judicial language. His camp describes it as a temporary obstacle rather than a fundamental challenge to the NDC's existence.

What NDC's Lawmakers Said

The NDC caucus in the House of Representatives went significantly further than Obi's measured statement.

In a statement signed by caucus leader Afam Ogene, the lawmakers accused the APC of orchestrating what they called a deliberate effort to weaken opposition parties through the courts rather than through electoral competition. The lawmakers described the latest ruling as "a judicial coup against democracy," insisting that it represented more than a mere legal error.

"To target the NDC at the precise moment the electoral process entered this critical phase is not coincidental. It is calculated, deliberate and despicable," they said. The caucus alleged that the ultimate objective was to weaken opposition participation in the 2027 elections and pave the way for an easy re-election bid for President Bola Tinubu. "We make bold to say that this is all about 2027, not the law, and never justice," the lawmakers stated.

They vowed to challenge the judgment through all available legal channels and expressed confidence that higher courts would reverse the ruling. "We will not yield. The NDC will not be de-registered by judicial decree. We will not be silenced," the caucus declared.

The APC has not publicly responded to the NDC's allegations of orchestration.

What the NDC's National Chairman Said

Addressing journalists in Abuja on Friday, NDC National Chairman Senator Moses Cleopas Zuwoghe took a swipe at the court's judgment, insisting that the party remains legally recognised and would immediately challenge the decision at the Court of Appeal. According to him, the court's latest decision did not order the party's deregistration and therefore does not affect its status as a registered political party.

That last point is legally contested. The PMP's counsel, Ekeocha, directly contradicted it, stating that every action INEC had taken in compliance with the vacated judgment stands reversed, which includes the issuance of the certificate of registration.

The Bigger Picture: A Party Born Under a Cloud

The Nigeria Democratic Congress entered Nigeria's political register in February 2026 already under a cloud. Friday's Federal High Court ruling in Lokoja, vacating the very judgment that birthed the party's legal existence, has now turned that cloud into a full-blown storm and exposed how shaky the NDC's foundation has been from the start.

This is the NDC's third major crisis since its formation. First, the internal battle with the Obidient Movement over the Seriake Dickson "doing you a favour" comment and the subsequent "No Work, No Vote" declaration. Second, the Kenneth Okonkwo defamation crisis in which both Peter Obi and Achike Udenwa issued N5 billion demands each over extortion allegations made on Channels Television. Now, the legal nullification of the party's very registration.

All three have happened since May 2026. The party that was supposed to be Nigeria's great opposition hope for 2027 is heading into the second half of 2026 fighting on three simultaneous fronts: internal cohesion, defamation litigation, and a fundamental legal battle over its right to exist.

The Court of Appeal will be the next arena. Whether the NDC can resolve the logo dispute with PMP, satisfy INEC's procedural requirements, and secure a fresh registration before the 2027 election cycle is the question Nigeria's opposition watchers are now asking with urgent seriousness.

What Comes Next

The NDC has confirmed it will appeal to the Court of Appeal. A hearing in the appellate court could produce a stay of execution of the Lokoja ruling, which would allow the NDC to retain its registered status while the legal process continues. If the Court of Appeal grants the stay, the NDC's position stabilises temporarily. If it does not, INEC will proceed with delisting the party.

Until a fresh judgment is delivered, the legal status of the NDC remains unresolved, while INEC is expected to comply with the latest court order and await the outcome of the renewed proceedings.

The 2027 presidential election is approximately 16 months away. Nigeria's most prominent opposition candidate leads a party whose legal foundation was ruled defective today by a Federal High Court.

The next hearing will determine whether that is a detour or a dead end.

Share:

Comments (0)

Leave a Comment

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!

Never Miss a Story

Get the latest breaking news and exclusive content delivered straight to your inbox.